< Team Practices Group < CSAT

Q3 FY1516

  • Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.00 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.38 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • NPS Score : 72


The following are key themes from answers to open-ended questions from Q3. The numbers under the theme indicates the frequency of mentions per theme. High counts under a specific theme indicate customer interest in that theme.

Please note that these specific questions were only asked in Q3 in order to evaluate key aspects of new focus areas that we might want to track (in this case qualities associated with "coaching" and "empowered teams"). We may add other open-ended questions from time to time.

Open-ended question 1: What would you expect from a team coach?

Team cohesionAdvice on Soft skillsMeeting FacilitationNegative feedbackUnclassifiableOverall vision
1118155221

Open-ended question 2: What qualities would you expect to see in an empowered team?

Cohesion. trust, funPositive communicationSelf-motivating and accountabilityProductiveRespectUnclassifiable
1561617432

Q2 FY1516

  • Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.13 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.47 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • NPS Score : 55.6


Q1 FY1516

  • Positively impacting value delivered by supported teams: 4.2 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • Positively impacting sustainability of supported teams: 4.6 out of 5 (Likert scale)
  • NPS Score : 66.6

The following are open response themes from Q1. The numbers under the theme indicates the frequency of mentions per theme. High counts under a specific theme would indicate customer interest in that theme.

Please note that we only ran these in the first iteration (Q1). We may add other open answer questions from time to time.

Open Question 1: Is there anything else, not listed above, that your TPGer helps with?

Experimentationcross-team coordinationpromoting best practices/Process detailsrunning meetingsMakes decisions easier by adding a neutral voiceTPGer doens't try to solve issues we don't haveFacilitate Self-awarenesNon-Agile Facilitation is goodTPGer makes it easier to collaborateCoachingNegative Comments
141191135500

Open Question 2: What would you miss the most if a TGPer was no longer on your team?

cross-team coordinationPositivity/energypromoting best practices/Process detailsneutral voiceTPGer is mirror for reflectionflexibilityTPGer keeps things calmmentorshipcoachingkeeps us focusedRunning Meetings
51016142440104


Open Questions 3: Do you have any other comments about your TPGer's performance?

what does TPG do outside of team?TPGer helps us move as a unit"+1" to mediationWas skeptical, now a believerWants TPG to do more conventional project managementcoordination is betterTPGer picks up the slack/spilloverPositive feedback on TPGernegative commentrecommendation/requests
246441242826

Q2 FY1617

  • Number of respondents: 20
  • NPS Score: 85
  • Survey frequency is fine for 12 out of 20 respondents (60%)
  • There are way too many surveys for 3 out of 20 respondents (15%)
  • There are slightly too many surveys for 2 out of 20 respondents (10%)
This article is issued from Mediawiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.