I wonder if there's a language where grammatical tense is not expressed by inflections on its verbs, but by inflecting some other part of speech?
Asked
Active
Viewed 209 times
7
-
3I found wiki article about the matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal_TAM – Nagavi Bindzuriani Jun 16 '15 at 09:32
-
Some languages also have nouns that are inflected for tense, but in such cases both nouns and verbs are marked. – Teusz Jun 16 '15 at 15:45
-
In Finnish, the distinction between present and future is not marked on the verb, but can be conveyed (though not always completely unambiguously) through the case suffix on the object noun: Hän syö pullaa** "He is eating a roll" vs. Hän syö pullan** "He will eat a roll". – user8017 Jun 20 '15 at 20:47
2 Answers
3
English marks tense in seperate words such as Auxiliaries and expletive (dummy) 'do'. In a sentence, these stand, syntactically-speaking: above / serially-speaking: to the left, of a verb:
This does not help. / This has proved helpful.
vs
This did not help. / This had proved helpful.
Verb = same
Time ≠ same
purlupar
- 638
- 3
- 16
-
There's also noun affixes like "ex-mother-in-law-to-be", which is future perfect if anything is. – jlawler Jun 20 '15 at 18:18
-
1
In Wolof, a language spoken in Senegal, Gambia, and Mauritania, the verbs never change their form, it is the pronouns that have the tense. In Wolof there is I-which-is-now, I-that-will-be, I-that-was, and so on, each pronoun has the 5 Wolof tenses, each tense having 2 aspect variants, perfect and imperfect. In other words, you take a past tense pronoun and the unchangeable verb and you get a past tense verb phrase.
Yellow Sky
- 18,268
- 39
- 65