10

Is there any evidence that the third person singular -s can be traced back to a lexical item before it became an inflection? I am trying to see if the theory of grammaticalization applies to its diachronic process. The cline of grammaticalization is as follows:

Lexical item > grammatical word > clitic > inflectional affix.

Nick Nicholas
  • 3,276
  • 24
  • 45
marta
  • 101
  • 2
  • I could have sworn I commented on this question. Strange. – Mark Beadles Jan 23 '12 at 15:41
  • 2
    I have seen this as PIE *-ti -> PGmc -di/-ði -> AS -t/-ð/-þ -> ME -th (Southern)/ -s (Northern) -> ModE -s. The Northern -s came from the influence of Norse mediopassive -sk; eventually the Northern usage became standard in Modern English. According to this, the form has been inflectional at least back to late PIE. – Mark Beadles Jan 23 '12 at 15:52
  • 1
    Oh, it was on English.SE also. That should have been noted. I will make this an answer. – Mark Beadles Jan 23 '12 at 18:00
  • 1
    Yes, someone suggested I post it here too. Thanks for your response in both ! – marta Jan 23 '12 at 20:37

1 Answers1

6

PIE *-ti -> PGmc *-di/-ði -> AS -t/-ð/-þ -> ME -th (Southern)/ -s (Northern) -> ModE -s

The Northern -s came from the influence of Norse mediopassive -sk; eventually the Northern usage became standard in Modern English. According to this, the form has been inflectional at least back to late PIE.

Mark Beadles
  • 6,860
  • 2
  • 24
  • 46