4

Many languages have comparative and superlative suffixes or other morphological forms such as English ‘-er’ and ‘-est’, Latin ‘-or’ and ‘-issimus’, and Arabic ‘afʕal’ template, but I couldn’t find any kanguages with a negative comparative forms, and even some websites which claimed they don’t exist in any language. Why is that and is there truly no language which has a ‘negative comparative’ form?

PS: What tags would fit this question, I couldn’t think of any.

Quintus Caesius - RM
  • 603
  • 4
  • 15
  • 3
    Most languages have negative comparative and superlative constructions – English has ‘less X’ and ‘(the) least X’, for example. What they generally don’t have are negative comparative/superlative morphological forms, made by adding a suffix or using a template, parallel to how the positive comparative and superlative are formed. The most obvious guess at a reason would be because the negatives are much rarer than the positives – you simply need them less often(!). – Janus Bahs Jacquet Jul 23 '21 at 07:56
  • Yes, mixed them up, sorry. – Quintus Caesius - RM Jul 23 '21 at 08:55
  • You may want to take a look at https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/a/2122/445 – Alex B. Jul 23 '21 at 12:32
  • As in, likely → unlikelier (less likely) → unlikeliest (least likely)? – Draconis Jul 23 '21 at 17:43
  • 1
    Not really? You can’t use that for any adjective, for example you can’t have ‘unbigger’. I was thinking something more like the opposite of ‘-er’, like some prefix or suffix that means ‘less’. – Quintus Caesius - RM Jul 23 '21 at 17:59
  • It's a nice question, but I doubt we can answer the "why" with more than speculation. – Luke Sawczak Jul 30 '21 at 13:24

0 Answers0